sometimes it's nice to just give a little. when all the gifts and glitter of the holiday season are cleared away, really what do we have left. besides torn wrapping paper, partially eaten candy candy canes andnew x-boxes, what's left is ourselves and how we treat each other during this season of "giving."
if you're about fun and giving back to those who have given a lot to other during their lives, then come on out to our first annual christmas carol event.
6pm--meet @ burlington lutheran church to practice, get song sheets, etc
6:20ish--go to creekside retirement center (behind fred meyer burlington, at the corner of gilkey and spruce streets).
6:45ish--finish singing, drink cocoa and eat cookies
after that: those interested take in a movie night
need more details? call: 630-9774
Monday, December 1, 2008
Sunday, November 16, 2008
see you at the movies
hey, high schoolers--
school: just what you want to think about on a sunday, right? probably NOT, but if you're interested in watching a cool film about a teacher who made a huge difference in the lives of some seriously disadvantaged people, then come on out to our film/review night. we'll be viewing and discussing FREEDOM WRITERS, starring hilary swank and patrick dempsey. this movie is uplifting minus the cheese. it's thought provoking but not preachy.
20117 gina marie lane
burlington, wa
6 pm-9ish
snacks provided
this is a high school event
hope to see you there!
kelli
school: just what you want to think about on a sunday, right? probably NOT, but if you're interested in watching a cool film about a teacher who made a huge difference in the lives of some seriously disadvantaged people, then come on out to our film/review night. we'll be viewing and discussing FREEDOM WRITERS, starring hilary swank and patrick dempsey. this movie is uplifting minus the cheese. it's thought provoking but not preachy.
20117 gina marie lane
burlington, wa
6 pm-9ish
snacks provided
this is a high school event
hope to see you there!
kelli
Monday, September 8, 2008
school days, school daze
so, i've talked to more than one of you who is a bit bewildered about going back to school. truth is, i've talked to some parents who are pretty freaked out, too! that first period morning bell on that first september day seems to come so quickly, doesn't it? what happened to summer? wasn't it just the fourth of july? and on and on.
the longer i live the more i realize that "back to school" comes very quickly in life. fourteen days of vacation go much more quickly than 14 days of school. three months of studying creep by in comparison to 3 months hanging with friends. four years of college speed by in comparison to four years at a 9-5 job.
some of this has to do with the ratio of time lived to time-yet-to live. when you're four, waiting six months until christmas seems like an eternity. it's not, but it seems like it is. and of course the reverse is also true: when you're 40 (i know: it's unimaginable, but just try!), what's one year? not so long, it seems.
the fact that life becomes increasingly complex as we get older doesn't help, either. it's harder to cherish the NOW and anticipate the FUTURE when we have so much to DO! again, christmas; when you were little it was almost all you thought about for from about halloween on. you couldn't wait for that december break, which seemed never to come. but today, as a young adult, well, you've got papers and finals and jobs to think about. christmas is exiting, but it's flanked by SATs, applying for schools, buying gifts for everyone, taking tests...it's harder to break through and revel in the anticipation...
i had a high school science teacher who used to say: "time flies whether you are having fun or not!" he said this very regularly, usually before a chemistry test or as a prep talk at the start of physics lab. we'd all grown. mr. smothers (his name; no joke) was soooo cheesy. he seemed to delight in seeing us cringe at his dorky "isms" and jokes. did he really think we were taking it to heart?
probably not, but, it turns out he had a point. time does go quickly, no matter if we're making the most of our opportunities or not, whether we want it to or not. so, here's to whining a little about the dying of summer and then getting to work at whatever it is we're working at. next summer will come, but not yet. not yet.
the longer i live the more i realize that "back to school" comes very quickly in life. fourteen days of vacation go much more quickly than 14 days of school. three months of studying creep by in comparison to 3 months hanging with friends. four years of college speed by in comparison to four years at a 9-5 job.
some of this has to do with the ratio of time lived to time-yet-to live. when you're four, waiting six months until christmas seems like an eternity. it's not, but it seems like it is. and of course the reverse is also true: when you're 40 (i know: it's unimaginable, but just try!), what's one year? not so long, it seems.
the fact that life becomes increasingly complex as we get older doesn't help, either. it's harder to cherish the NOW and anticipate the FUTURE when we have so much to DO! again, christmas; when you were little it was almost all you thought about for from about halloween on. you couldn't wait for that december break, which seemed never to come. but today, as a young adult, well, you've got papers and finals and jobs to think about. christmas is exiting, but it's flanked by SATs, applying for schools, buying gifts for everyone, taking tests...it's harder to break through and revel in the anticipation...
i had a high school science teacher who used to say: "time flies whether you are having fun or not!" he said this very regularly, usually before a chemistry test or as a prep talk at the start of physics lab. we'd all grown. mr. smothers (his name; no joke) was soooo cheesy. he seemed to delight in seeing us cringe at his dorky "isms" and jokes. did he really think we were taking it to heart?
probably not, but, it turns out he had a point. time does go quickly, no matter if we're making the most of our opportunities or not, whether we want it to or not. so, here's to whining a little about the dying of summer and then getting to work at whatever it is we're working at. next summer will come, but not yet. not yet.
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
freedom for what?
so, it's almost the fourth of july, that time when we pull out the old navy flag t-shirts, dust off the bbq, get the parade chairs out of storage, and try to remember how to light m-60s with out blowing off our fingers.
i don't know about you, but the fourth of july has always a favorite holiday of mine. family and friends would gather at our house (which was on an island and which had cool places to camp, hang out, etc), we'd watch our little (and i mean little) local parade, eat bbq salmon and tons of berries and ice cream, and then gear up for the second largest fireworks display in western washington (after the lake union one in seattle).
there's more. something about the fourth of july seems less stressful than christmas (another favorite). maybe it's because that' there's less commercialism surrounding it and thus i don't feel "advertised at" for the three months preceding the holiday. maybe it's that there's no pressure to find the "perfect gift" for like 20 people (or more). maybe it's that the weather in december around here is generally cold, but in july tends to be warm and the revelry taken outdoors. who can't feel at least a little relaxed sitting outside wearing shorts and flip flops, right?
while there are major and obvious differences between the fourth of july and christmas, i see at least one major similarity: both holidays are about FREEDOM. christmas, of course, is when we celebrate the coming of christ into our world as a human being. christmas is a "big chapter" in the god's story of redemption (with the final one being the second coming and the middle one being easter). when christ came, we got a tangible message from god: i love you so much that i am making a way to secure your freedom. christ will grow up among you, live a sinless life, embody love and justice and then die a very unjust death. but don't worry, at easter i will raise him up and then show you how to follow him all the way to the new world--the kindgom--i am setting up for you.
the fourth of july, it must be stressed, is NOT a christian holiday, per se. it is not a christian symbol, or a "religious" remembrance at all, at least not in the way that christmas and easter are for christians (or ramadan is for muslims and yom kippur is for jews, for that matter). at the same time, the fourth of july touches all americans deeply because it is about freedom. and freedom is a fundamental human longing, a key civil concept, and a bedrock western value. put another way, freedom is so personal and so deep to most people, especially americans, it's hard to image life without it.
but, that's the thing. the fourth of july is when we celebrate that our country GAINED political freedom from another nation (england). this country exists as a country because of it; otherwise we'd be calling ourselves something like the united colonies of america, drink tea everyday at 4 pm and use the british pound (or the euro) for our money. (it's a lot deeper than that, but those are just some everyday realities that would be different for us). the point is, freedom for americans is a part of us, part of our national identity.
so what's the connection between christmas and the fourth of july? both are times when we celebrate aspects of our freedom. at christmas we celebrate the one who came to set us spiritually free from the law of sin and death that formerly reigned over us (Gal 5:1). without christ--without believing in him and his perfect sacrifice for us--we're spiritually chained up, enslaved. at the fourth of july, we celebrate our national or civil freedom, our ability to assemble ourselves as a particular nation with certain laws, freedoms, rights and so forth.
the challenge, in both cases but for different reasons, is to remember what our freedom means, how precious it is and which responsibilities it requires. spiritually we are now free to obey god and love others. civically we are free to live responsibly by the laws that we ourselves (or people representing us) have chosen to live by. in both cases (again in different respects), freedom is linked with responsibility. something to think about.
i don't know about you, but the fourth of july has always a favorite holiday of mine. family and friends would gather at our house (which was on an island and which had cool places to camp, hang out, etc), we'd watch our little (and i mean little) local parade, eat bbq salmon and tons of berries and ice cream, and then gear up for the second largest fireworks display in western washington (after the lake union one in seattle).
there's more. something about the fourth of july seems less stressful than christmas (another favorite). maybe it's because that' there's less commercialism surrounding it and thus i don't feel "advertised at" for the three months preceding the holiday. maybe it's that there's no pressure to find the "perfect gift" for like 20 people (or more). maybe it's that the weather in december around here is generally cold, but in july tends to be warm and the revelry taken outdoors. who can't feel at least a little relaxed sitting outside wearing shorts and flip flops, right?
while there are major and obvious differences between the fourth of july and christmas, i see at least one major similarity: both holidays are about FREEDOM. christmas, of course, is when we celebrate the coming of christ into our world as a human being. christmas is a "big chapter" in the god's story of redemption (with the final one being the second coming and the middle one being easter). when christ came, we got a tangible message from god: i love you so much that i am making a way to secure your freedom. christ will grow up among you, live a sinless life, embody love and justice and then die a very unjust death. but don't worry, at easter i will raise him up and then show you how to follow him all the way to the new world--the kindgom--i am setting up for you.
the fourth of july, it must be stressed, is NOT a christian holiday, per se. it is not a christian symbol, or a "religious" remembrance at all, at least not in the way that christmas and easter are for christians (or ramadan is for muslims and yom kippur is for jews, for that matter). at the same time, the fourth of july touches all americans deeply because it is about freedom. and freedom is a fundamental human longing, a key civil concept, and a bedrock western value. put another way, freedom is so personal and so deep to most people, especially americans, it's hard to image life without it.
but, that's the thing. the fourth of july is when we celebrate that our country GAINED political freedom from another nation (england). this country exists as a country because of it; otherwise we'd be calling ourselves something like the united colonies of america, drink tea everyday at 4 pm and use the british pound (or the euro) for our money. (it's a lot deeper than that, but those are just some everyday realities that would be different for us). the point is, freedom for americans is a part of us, part of our national identity.
so what's the connection between christmas and the fourth of july? both are times when we celebrate aspects of our freedom. at christmas we celebrate the one who came to set us spiritually free from the law of sin and death that formerly reigned over us (Gal 5:1). without christ--without believing in him and his perfect sacrifice for us--we're spiritually chained up, enslaved. at the fourth of july, we celebrate our national or civil freedom, our ability to assemble ourselves as a particular nation with certain laws, freedoms, rights and so forth.
the challenge, in both cases but for different reasons, is to remember what our freedom means, how precious it is and which responsibilities it requires. spiritually we are now free to obey god and love others. civically we are free to live responsibly by the laws that we ourselves (or people representing us) have chosen to live by. in both cases (again in different respects), freedom is linked with responsibility. something to think about.
Friday, June 6, 2008
the urban Xperience '08
for those who love adventure, learning and fun: good news! on our docket this summer is the urban Xperience. the urban Xperience is a weekend of ministry, learning and fun in seattle, july 25-27. the idea is enjoy the sights, sounds and tastes of seattle while learning about urban ministry--extending christ's compassion to the underserved in the city who need a help up. we'll team up with the compass center, a really cool ministry associated with our denom that does a ton of awesome stuff for people in transition, for those who would otherwise be among the 8,000 seattle-ites a day who call the street home. by hanging out with and lending a hand to compass center friends, we're sure to learn a lot about how christ views the city--the people who live there--and how we can learn from and help them. part of the trip will be at least one service project--doing light landscaping, serving a meal, etc.
stay tune for more details about this trip. check your mailbox for a paper flyer about it. if you're interested in learning more right now, email me at kellibuzz@gmail.com.
peace!
kelli
www.compasscenter.org
compass center
77 s washington st
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 357-3100
stay tune for more details about this trip. check your mailbox for a paper flyer about it. if you're interested in learning more right now, email me at kellibuzz@gmail.com.
peace!
kelli
www.compasscenter.org
compass center
77 s washington st
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 357-3100
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
don't get expelled
This friday a documentary film called EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed is opening all around the country, including our local cinema. It's about the politics of science, specifically the apparent "cover-up" going on in classrooms and labs across America to suppress the question: if Darwinism explains the evolution of species, how do we account for the existence of cells, those building blocks of life? Where did they come from? Does Darwinian science sufficiently explain this?

Before I go on I must say that I have precious little pure interest in biology and even less in the so-called evolution/intelligent design debate. I took philosophy of science, even at the graduate level, and while I think I get the basic scientific issues at hand I really don't care. My Christian faith is not threatened by science, not one bit. I believe God created the universe ex nihilo, that is, out of nothing, but I don't have a formed opinion on how He did this. One of my former professors used to say that while science explains the how of things, Christian faith explains the why of them. That works for me and so I'm content to sit back and drink a cappuccino while people around me haggle about things like Neanderthal Man and the beaks of a group of Galapagos Islands finch birds.
I'm content, that is, until the conversation comes around to issues of culture and politics connected with the discussion (the philosophy part of the philosophy of science). When I hear that professors in this country might being summarily fired if they even mention to their students the possibility that the universe may have had an intelligent (vs. purely "natural") origin, well, I get riled. What about First Amendment Rights, you know, like free speech? Is a professor denied this right in his or her classroom when it comes to this issue? What's really going on here?
My thinking is this, if our country is nothing else it is welcoming place for the free exchange of ideas. Isn't our free press based on the idea that with the exchange of ideas, with the plurality of voices speaking out on any given issue, the truth is liable to come out? If intelligent design is so whacked out, so unscientific, then the broader public will eventually affirm as much and the controversy will die down. And by "die down" I mean, the issue will be address sufficiently and clearly so that further questions are easily answered--something that seems NOT to be happening these days when people point out the holes in Darwinian theory.
The irony about a controversy like this one is that whenever one side tries to act as if it's sufficiently put to rest--as it seems like might be happening in this case--the controversy tends to escalate rather than die out. The more one side says: These questions are stupid!!! But has not answers, the more the other side starts thinking: Maybe all the hollering is meant to distract us from seeing that Darwin has not clothes on! So I say, let the voices be heard. If intelligent design is so ignorant (pun intended), it won't last. If Darwinism is true, it will.
For those of us who may be thinking: isn't this a moot topic, isn't this an old fight between Fundamentalist Christians and the rest of us? Isn't this a culture-war scuffle created by scared and uninformed gun-toting bitter people who fear change and thus cling to their faith (to paraphrase a recent and infamous Obama quote!)? Well, it might seem like that on the surface, but consider the scientific aspects of the issue, as described by retired UC Berkley professor Philip E. Johnson:
"The argument for intelligent design in biology was soon taken up in books by two highly qualified authors, biochemistry professor Michael Behe, author of Darwin’s Black Box, and mathematician/philosopher William Dembski, whose book The Design Inference was published after peer review by Cambridge University Press. (More popular-level books by Dembski are available from internet booksellers.) Many individual scientists showed significant interest in these books as well as my own, and expressed their skepticism of the claim that known material mechanisms could account for the origin of the complex specified information required for the intricate functional activities of the living cell, let alone the information needed to coordinate the functions of thousand or millions of cells involved in the life processes of a multi-cellular animal.
To my disappointment, however, influential scientific organizations formed a solid bloc of opposition to the consideration of whether evidence points to the possible involvement of intelligent causes in the history of life. Nevertheless, the subject is sufficiently fascinating, that orthodox scientific bodies have had to take strenuous action to keep it from cropping up in science education, and even in scientific journals."
INTELLIGENT DESIGN IN BIOLOGY: THE CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
Phillip E. Johnson
Think (The Royal Institute of Philosophy)
February 19, 2007
I doubt any of us will change our minds about the biology of this issue. I have an inkling that most people care as little as I do about the science of this controversy. But I hope that some of you are interested in the cultural ramifications of it. If professors and students can't talk freely about the strengths and apparent weaknesses in the Theory of Darwinism, what's next? Expelled for discussing the Universal Law of Gravitation or the Theory of Relativity?

Before I go on I must say that I have precious little pure interest in biology and even less in the so-called evolution/intelligent design debate. I took philosophy of science, even at the graduate level, and while I think I get the basic scientific issues at hand I really don't care. My Christian faith is not threatened by science, not one bit. I believe God created the universe ex nihilo, that is, out of nothing, but I don't have a formed opinion on how He did this. One of my former professors used to say that while science explains the how of things, Christian faith explains the why of them. That works for me and so I'm content to sit back and drink a cappuccino while people around me haggle about things like Neanderthal Man and the beaks of a group of Galapagos Islands finch birds.
I'm content, that is, until the conversation comes around to issues of culture and politics connected with the discussion (the philosophy part of the philosophy of science). When I hear that professors in this country might being summarily fired if they even mention to their students the possibility that the universe may have had an intelligent (vs. purely "natural") origin, well, I get riled. What about First Amendment Rights, you know, like free speech? Is a professor denied this right in his or her classroom when it comes to this issue? What's really going on here?
My thinking is this, if our country is nothing else it is welcoming place for the free exchange of ideas. Isn't our free press based on the idea that with the exchange of ideas, with the plurality of voices speaking out on any given issue, the truth is liable to come out? If intelligent design is so whacked out, so unscientific, then the broader public will eventually affirm as much and the controversy will die down. And by "die down" I mean, the issue will be address sufficiently and clearly so that further questions are easily answered--something that seems NOT to be happening these days when people point out the holes in Darwinian theory.
The irony about a controversy like this one is that whenever one side tries to act as if it's sufficiently put to rest--as it seems like might be happening in this case--the controversy tends to escalate rather than die out. The more one side says: These questions are stupid!!! But has not answers, the more the other side starts thinking: Maybe all the hollering is meant to distract us from seeing that Darwin has not clothes on! So I say, let the voices be heard. If intelligent design is so ignorant (pun intended), it won't last. If Darwinism is true, it will.
For those of us who may be thinking: isn't this a moot topic, isn't this an old fight between Fundamentalist Christians and the rest of us? Isn't this a culture-war scuffle created by scared and uninformed gun-toting bitter people who fear change and thus cling to their faith (to paraphrase a recent and infamous Obama quote!)? Well, it might seem like that on the surface, but consider the scientific aspects of the issue, as described by retired UC Berkley professor Philip E. Johnson:
"The argument for intelligent design in biology was soon taken up in books by two highly qualified authors, biochemistry professor Michael Behe, author of Darwin’s Black Box, and mathematician/philosopher William Dembski, whose book The Design Inference was published after peer review by Cambridge University Press. (More popular-level books by Dembski are available from internet booksellers.) Many individual scientists showed significant interest in these books as well as my own, and expressed their skepticism of the claim that known material mechanisms could account for the origin of the complex specified information required for the intricate functional activities of the living cell, let alone the information needed to coordinate the functions of thousand or millions of cells involved in the life processes of a multi-cellular animal.
To my disappointment, however, influential scientific organizations formed a solid bloc of opposition to the consideration of whether evidence points to the possible involvement of intelligent causes in the history of life. Nevertheless, the subject is sufficiently fascinating, that orthodox scientific bodies have had to take strenuous action to keep it from cropping up in science education, and even in scientific journals."
INTELLIGENT DESIGN IN BIOLOGY: THE CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
Phillip E. Johnson
Think (The Royal Institute of Philosophy)
February 19, 2007
I doubt any of us will change our minds about the biology of this issue. I have an inkling that most people care as little as I do about the science of this controversy. But I hope that some of you are interested in the cultural ramifications of it. If professors and students can't talk freely about the strengths and apparent weaknesses in the Theory of Darwinism, what's next? Expelled for discussing the Universal Law of Gravitation or the Theory of Relativity?
Friday, April 11, 2008
an audience of...whom?
It has been several days since I wrote here. I didn't mean to take a spring break, it just happened! I got a little busy with other things, but mostly I haven't been ultra-motivated to do blog entries. Why? Simply, I don't know if anyone is reading or if I am talking to myself. Self-absorbed? Maybe. Honest? Definitely.
I think if we all stopped to think about it, precious little we do in the course of our days is really altruistic (done for the genuine good of others even at risk to ourselves) or is spiritually centered (done because we love God). Simply put, as highly social beings we like others to see what we're doing (at least the good things!) and to take note. Consider any kid you have spent more than 30 seconds around. What often comes out of their mouths (besides No! and Mine!)? Something like: "Watch me! Watch me! I can do it! Look at me!" Kids like us to watch them and, better yet, praise them for their accomplishments, big or small.
It's not just kids, though. Youth and adults alike want to "get credit" for doing good. Would you study as hard at school if it were pass/fail, or better yet, if there were not grades at all? Would you train as hard if every team got the trophy? How about work as hard at your job if you got the same for sitting around as you did for hustling around for 8 hours? Of course not. We all need motivation to do what we're doing, and that make sense. The question is, what motivates us?
Yesterday I previewed The Presige, the movie that will be showing at Bethlehem this Sunday night at 6 PM. There is a ton to unpack and mull over from this movie--from the interesting details to the big picture themes. One of those themes is motivation. Why the magicians do what they do and what they are willing to risk, sacrifice for the art of illusion that is their vocation and, I dare say, the core of their lives.
My question for us today is: what motivates us to do what we do? Would we be as quick to do chores around the house if our mom didn't notice? Would we be involved in all those clubs and charities if we couldn't put it on our college resumes?
The Bible says that at one point the world became so dark, so gloomy and evil that not only were people doing horrible, awful stuff (like disobeying parents--no joke!), but they cheered on others to do the same (Romans 1). I'd say our culture reflects that picture pretty well today. In the name of fame, of saying: "Watch me! Look at me! I can do it!" all sorts of twisty, harsh and weird stuff happens. Consider a group of high school girls who recently in order to become famous, to get attention, beat another girl unconscious and then posted it youtube. The phrase "fifteeen minutes of fame" which Andy Warhol coined years ago comes to mind: our culture has become so trivialized that eventually everyone will become famous for a brief time, not necessarily for doing valiant deeds but for doing stupid, inane and even evil stuff (the show Jackass comes to mind here).
The question is: what about us? What crowd are we playing to? What are we willing to risk or sacrifice, in order to do what we know is right? Fame? A good reputation? Some other form of glory? Or an internal sense of satisfaction for the good? The answer to this question, I believe, helps determine what we're going to be about. If we know what's motivating us--and it's not first and foremost the praise of others, then it's not so hard to see how wrong it is to beat people up for fun And, it's a lot easier to to do good when no one is watching to praise us for it, too. Because we know that at the end of the day someone is watching-God, the audience of one. He sees everything, every heart, motivation and deed, and He cares more than we want to know about what we're doing and why.
I think if we all stopped to think about it, precious little we do in the course of our days is really altruistic (done for the genuine good of others even at risk to ourselves) or is spiritually centered (done because we love God). Simply put, as highly social beings we like others to see what we're doing (at least the good things!) and to take note. Consider any kid you have spent more than 30 seconds around. What often comes out of their mouths (besides No! and Mine!)? Something like: "Watch me! Watch me! I can do it! Look at me!" Kids like us to watch them and, better yet, praise them for their accomplishments, big or small.
It's not just kids, though. Youth and adults alike want to "get credit" for doing good. Would you study as hard at school if it were pass/fail, or better yet, if there were not grades at all? Would you train as hard if every team got the trophy? How about work as hard at your job if you got the same for sitting around as you did for hustling around for 8 hours? Of course not. We all need motivation to do what we're doing, and that make sense. The question is, what motivates us?
Yesterday I previewed The Presige, the movie that will be showing at Bethlehem this Sunday night at 6 PM. There is a ton to unpack and mull over from this movie--from the interesting details to the big picture themes. One of those themes is motivation. Why the magicians do what they do and what they are willing to risk, sacrifice for the art of illusion that is their vocation and, I dare say, the core of their lives.
My question for us today is: what motivates us to do what we do? Would we be as quick to do chores around the house if our mom didn't notice? Would we be involved in all those clubs and charities if we couldn't put it on our college resumes? The Bible says that at one point the world became so dark, so gloomy and evil that not only were people doing horrible, awful stuff (like disobeying parents--no joke!), but they cheered on others to do the same (Romans 1). I'd say our culture reflects that picture pretty well today. In the name of fame, of saying: "Watch me! Look at me! I can do it!" all sorts of twisty, harsh and weird stuff happens. Consider a group of high school girls who recently in order to become famous, to get attention, beat another girl unconscious and then posted it youtube. The phrase "fifteeen minutes of fame" which Andy Warhol coined years ago comes to mind: our culture has become so trivialized that eventually everyone will become famous for a brief time, not necessarily for doing valiant deeds but for doing stupid, inane and even evil stuff (the show Jackass comes to mind here).
The question is: what about us? What crowd are we playing to? What are we willing to risk or sacrifice, in order to do what we know is right? Fame? A good reputation? Some other form of glory? Or an internal sense of satisfaction for the good? The answer to this question, I believe, helps determine what we're going to be about. If we know what's motivating us--and it's not first and foremost the praise of others, then it's not so hard to see how wrong it is to beat people up for fun And, it's a lot easier to to do good when no one is watching to praise us for it, too. Because we know that at the end of the day someone is watching-God, the audience of one. He sees everything, every heart, motivation and deed, and He cares more than we want to know about what we're doing and why.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
